Alerts for the Journal

Click to get an email alert for every new issue of

Journal of International Special Needs Education

Journal Information

Print ISSN: 2159-4341
Online ISSN:
2331-4001
Frequency: Bi-annually

Register for a Profile

Not Yet Registered?

Benefits of Registration Include:
  • A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)

  • The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level

  • The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers
Register Now!
Previous Article Next Article

Inclusion and Equity in Australian Secondary Schools

David Paterson

University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia

Lorraine Graham

University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

Robert Stevens

NSW Department of Education and Training, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Authors' Note: The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the SiMERR National Research Centre, the NSW Department of Education and Communities, participating schools and partners in the AESOP Research Project.

Corresponding author: David Paterson, Faculty of Education, Science, Technology & Mathematics, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2601, Australia,
Abstract

This paper presents findings from a large-scale, in-depth study of secondary schools in one Australian state that were achieving exceptional outcomes. The element of that study on which this paper focuses is equity and inclusion. We examine the Equity programs operating in seven sites where schools were including students experiencing some form of disadvantages significant enough to hinder their engagement with the school curriculum. These forms of disadvantage included students with intellectual disabilities as well as students from Aboriginal, non English-speaking and low socio-economic status backgrounds. At these sites, schools implemented equity programs targeting a range of student needs. It was noted that the success of those programs was largely dependent on the relationships between teachers and students and between teachers and their colleagues. Four themes emerged from analysis of interview and observational data; i) teachers focused on students' learning needs, ii) teachers worked collaboratively in effective teams in communities, iii) programs had adequate and well-managed resources and, iv) programs were developed to meet students' needs. Central to all of these themes was the learning needs of students. Rather than paying ‘lip service' to aspects of disadvantage, students in these schools were actually being included in the process of learning and programs had as their central focus the learning needs of individual students.